BeatleLinks LogoNav Panel New Sites Cool Sites Top Rated Fab Forum Add A Site Link To Us Revolution Radio New Products



Go Back   BeatleLinks Fab Forum > Solo Forums > Menlove Avenue


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Aug 16, 2012, 05:47 PM   #1
misfittoy
Dr. Robert
 
misfittoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 14, 2011
Posts: 1,074
Default 10 Unpleasant facts about John Lennon

Read it. Fume. then discuss.
http://listverse.com/2012/05/12/top-...t-john-lennon/

To be honest, except for the one about Julian, I can counter most of these and will do so.
misfittoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2012, 06:06 PM   #2
Apple Scruff
Sun King
 
Apple Scruff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 10, 2002
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 10,536

Default

Dear misfit, thank you for bringing this to our attention. But, you know, as Lennonistas/ists I think we are all aware of the many bright and dark sides of John's persona. It was the complexities that made him so fascinating. The struggles to right the wrongs, or to fight the bad. Instead of delving into that darkness and doing something destructive, he chose to focus his energy on POSITIVE and extremely meaningful messages.

Anyone who gives enough of a care to humanity the way John did does not deserve to have every sin listed out and aired for the public to pounce on, but it happens. Sad reality of being an icon.

But when I hear people singing along to his words, humming his music, and using his songs and art to spread messages that give light, happiness, and joy out into the world...I just look at these negative a-holes/non-entities who have accomplished nothing but disparaging nastiness and, well...



Let me recycle a confession I actually made to the Beatles Confessions tumblr a while back. I meant it then and every word stands now:

__________________
"Let me live in you..." ~ John Lennon

Last edited by Apple Scruff : Aug 16, 2012 at 06:07 PM.
Apple Scruff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2012, 06:50 PM   #3
ChrisG134
Sun King
 
ChrisG134's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 09, 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,636

Default

The man was human just like the rest of us.He was no saint.He made mistakes,which one of us here didn't!Who ever this jackass is didn't know him.He's been dead for 31 yrs. for crying out loud!Let him rest in peace!He's not here to defend himself!
The other comment about being "talentless",really pisses me off!You might not be a fan of his or The Beatles but say they sucked is total BS!!I'm not a fan of Bob Dylan or Jimi Hendrix but,I know how much they changed music and their impact on it!At least acknowledge it!!
__________________
Springsteen ROCKS my world!!
ChrisG134 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2012, 07:05 PM   #4
Maia 66
Sun King
 
Join Date: Sep 09, 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,360

Default

Ugh, whoever wrote that list is a total idiot! It's like the Encyclopedia for the Completely Uninformed View of John Lennon. (Or maybe it was written as a joke to provoke anger from us old Beatles fans. )

Anyway, yeah, John did some of those things... but the generalizations that the author makes reveal a narrow-minded bigotry. If John Lennon was a wife-beater, then why not call George and Ringo the same? They were both known to have hit a woman or two. Abused his son? Well, Ritchie was not exactly the most attentive and loving parent to young Zak and Jason... Politically clueless? What does that even mean? Was he running for Senate or something? No, he was an artist in the '70s... politics was theater, politics was infused into everyday life... John just reflected that back to us. He never claimed to have any answer. Talentless?! The author lost all credibility with that one... and the other idiotic claims.

But the total zero of a claim is that John was a pathological liar. Poor memory, perhaps... an embellisher, yeah okay. But not a f@@@in' liar.

Here are the author's claims:

Quote:
He claimed he had been a working class lad from Liverpool before the Beatles; he was actually raised in a comfortable middle-class home. He denied being married during his early years of stardom. He claimed to have met Yoko Ono at an art show and their love blossomed spontaneously; in fact, Ono had stalked him for months before he gave in to her advances. He claimed to have lost interest in the Beatles due to Paul McCartney’s tendencies toward pop music and dominant role in the group, as well as his desire to do his more avant-garde work outside the band; in fact, he had all but left the band in its last two years as the result of a serious addiction to heroin. When he emerged back into the public eye shortly before his death, he claimed that he had been spending time baking bread and being a stay-at-home dad; in fact, he had been living in a drug-induced haze most of the time.
1. John never denied that he was from a suburban home "a half an inch" higher in the perplexing (to an American) British class system than Paul's council estate.

2. He did first meet Yoko at the Indica Gallery. Her supposed "stalking" of him occurred after that. (And even if they did meet before November '66, tell me one couple who doesn't have an established--if questionable--"creation myth.")

3. "He claimed to have lost interest in the Beatles due to Paul McCartney’s tendencies toward pop music and dominant role in the group" -- Uhhhhm, no. He claimed that he grew bored, that he knew that the end of touring meant the end of the Beatles, that the loss of Brian Epstein meant the loss of some mystic glue that kept them together, that the Beatles just grew apart. He was John Lennon... a more restless spirit you will not find. And he was not addicted to heroin for the last two years of The Beatles.
__________________

All I want is the truth
Just give me some truth...



Last edited by Maia 66 : Aug 16, 2012 at 07:07 PM.
Maia 66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 17, 2012, 03:55 PM   #5
Serena
Moderator
 
Serena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 28, 2004
Location: The upper stages of lower life
Posts: 1,465


Default

I'm sorry, I was misled by the term 'fact' in there. I guess it depends on which side of the looking glass you're standing on, one man's fraud is another's hero.


Besides, he was one of the front men for the fucking Beatles, why would he need to embellish or lie about his life?
__________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."-Winston Churchill:


Last edited by Serena : Aug 17, 2012 at 03:59 PM.
Serena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 17, 2012, 04:46 PM   #6
wallrus59
Bulldog
 
wallrus59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 13, 2010
Posts: 2,084

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serena View Post
I'm sorry, I was misled by the term 'fact' in there. I guess it depends on which side of the looking glass you're standing on, one man's fraud is another's hero.


Besides, he was one of the front men for the fucking Beatles, why would he need to embellish or lie about his life?

as a cool funk buddy of mine in the 70s said.."right on, right on , right on"

gk.
__________________
_______________________________________

wallrus59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2012, 05:02 AM   #7
TheEggman
Nowhere Man
 
TheEggman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 15, 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 211
Default

10.Wife-beater-I think it's a fact that he hit Cynthia once in the 50's but she specifically said she never hit her again. I don't think there's ever been any reliable or credible evidence that he hit Yoko so that's that.
9.Emotionally Abused His Son-Yeah. It's pretty much beyond dispute that he wasn't very attentive to julian throughout his life. That's not emotional abuse though. Millions if not billions of dads are suprisngly akward and emotionally distant to their children esp. sons. My dad hardly said a word to us when we were growing up. He just sat there at the dinner table with a miserable look on his face. That's life.
8.Pathological Liar-"Everyone does this to some extent". Nuff said.
7.Broke Up the Beatles-Actually that's sorta true but as John himself said "It's not the end of the world" or a crme against humanity. It's not even immoral!!!
6.Politically Clueless-I actually pretty much agree with this. I find his behaviour around the end of the 60's early 70's a bit embarrasing. He was being arrogant and dogmatic and to acheive things politically you need to think and act with a sophisticated stratergy not jut go round saying whatever you think.
5.Talentless-Strangely enough he wasn't. He actually wrote aand co-wrote a rich and varied collection of songs throughout his life some of which were indisputably works of complete and utter genius. He also had the talent to pick up other people's songs, obviously Paul's mainly, and perform on them with remarkable ease.
4.Follower Not a Leader-He also wore the same style of hat as Bob Dylan for a while.
3.Mindless Conformist-Maybe some truth in that but so what?
2.He happily went along with the Beatles’ haircuts, suits, and calculated image-He went along with it. True. He wasn't happy about it though. Hardly 'unpleasant' though.
1.Hypocrite-Mmh! Maybe some truth in some of that esp. the possessions but it's not like it really matters when it comes to listening to his music.
TheEggman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2012, 08:00 AM   #8
hibgal
Sun King
 
hibgal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 01, 2006
Posts: 26,650



Default Nobody's perfect

So what? Hey, I'm sure we could find 10 unpleasant 'facts' about Mother Theresa if we tried!
__________________



Sometimes I dream in colors
It always happens when
I find myself with others
Who don't pretend
hibgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2012, 09:42 AM   #9
Serena
Moderator
 
Serena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 28, 2004
Location: The upper stages of lower life
Posts: 1,465


Default

^You wouldn't have to try so hard....but nevertheless the whole of character is still greater than the sum of its parts.
__________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."-Winston Churchill:


Last edited by Serena : Aug 18, 2012 at 09:42 AM.
Serena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2012, 10:03 AM   #10
Colonel Angus
Dr. Robert
 
Colonel Angus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 24, 2011
Posts: 1,306

Default

Who the hell is this guy?

Colonel Angus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2012, 07:15 AM   #11
Apple Scruff
Sun King
 
Apple Scruff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 10, 2002
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 10,536

Thumbs down Just want to add...

I guess the thing that bothers me most is that many of these online articles are created by those who can hide behind the powerful mask of anonymity on the 'net. So when they publish this BS and feed it to a bunch of thirsty fangirls/boys who aren't able to distinguish truth from fiction, there is the issue of taking everything at face value. I think you have to be a brighter person. Unfortunately, and I hate to say it, most bloggers/commenters on these articles aren't the smartest. They have no problem with believing anything on a list without questioning the source, or trying to understand the motive.

This is a case of:



And that says more about society nowadays than anything that could be true/untrue/exaggerated about John. SHM...
__________________
"Let me live in you..." ~ John Lennon
Apple Scruff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2012, 07:17 AM   #12
Apple Scruff
Sun King
 
Apple Scruff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 10, 2002
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 10,536

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel Angus View Post
Who the hell is this guy?

That would definitely NOT be John.
__________________
"Let me live in you..." ~ John Lennon
Apple Scruff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2012, 09:34 AM   #13
Maia 66
Sun King
 
Join Date: Sep 09, 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,360

Default

^ I think that guy is the "John" in some tribute band.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEggman View Post
6.Politically Clueless-I actually pretty much agree with this. I find his behaviour around the end of the 60's early 70's a bit embarrasing. He was being arrogant and dogmatic and to acheive things politically you need to think and act with a sophisticated stratergy not jut go round saying whatever you think.
I keep hearing this argument and I think it just shows that people still misunderstand what John was trying to accomplish. His was an artistic statement, not a political one. He was definitely naive at times about things, but he was not so naive as to think that he would bring the Vietnam War to an end single-handedly.

Here in the U.S., the right has been very successful the past 30+ years (especially since Karl Rove joined forces with the W) in selling certain ideas to the working and middle classes, even though many of their ideas run contrary to the economic interests of those people. They've appealed to people's fears and organized a massive advertising campaign, aided by right-wing anti-intellectuals on the radio, where truck drivers and construction workers can listen to them as they work.

John tried to do his version of that... using the "advertising" space he received for free by the media to send a message of peace (as opposed to fear). Now you can say that he was not successful because the entire world is not at peace, but in many ways he did achieve a measure of success. First of all, it's true he did not organize... and had he organized a massive campaign, he may have been able to do more. BUT, he did get the message out... he is forever linked with the peace movement, he has people thinking about what "peace" really means... and his work influenced countless people (including yours truly) who decided to live their lives and dedicate their work to creating a more peaceful and socially just society. And I pass that message along to the thousands of students who are under my charge, who hear a message of peace among the violence they live in... they learn that "peaceful solutions to problems are the only way to accomplish your goals."

__________________

All I want is the truth
Just give me some truth...


Maia 66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2012, 10:59 AM   #14
Fly
Dr. Robert
 
Fly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 21, 2002
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Posts: 1,302
Default

F**king amen Maia. Why the f**k are people biting on John over his political naivete? It wasn't like he was elected as anyone's leader, though he absolutely was one. But to make such a GAWDA** deal out of one man's wrong choices boils my blood. John's intent wasn't to overcome war and bring peace instantly on earth. I think we all know he wasn't that crazy. He was trying to REFOCUS the people, to remove their a$$es from the gun barrels for a second and redirect them to something that was a great deal more worthy and less destructive.

I noticed that most of the critics are the ones who didn't do a f**king thing. I mean, someone actually posted some soldier's reminisces on John somewhere on this board and it broke me down. Here is someone who actually risked their own life, who went through it, defending John's motives and explaining why he loved them. I guess I'm biased because I always KNEW John was selling peace like a product and it never bothered me. In fact I always thought it was an act of pure genius- no one else ever had the balls and the other three Beatles included. I said it and I meant it.
__________________
"It does not matter how old you are, you're as young as you feel right now." John Lennon
Fly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2012, 11:15 AM   #15
Fly
Dr. Robert
 
Fly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 21, 2002
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Posts: 1,302
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by hibgal View Post
So what? Hey, I'm sure we could find 10 unpleasant 'facts' about Mother Theresa if we tried!
Thank you.
__________________
"It does not matter how old you are, you're as young as you feel right now." John Lennon
Fly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2012, 02:29 PM   #16
TheEggman
Nowhere Man
 
TheEggman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 15, 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fly View Post
F**king amen Maia. Why the f**k are people biting on John over his political naivete? It wasn't like he was elected as anyone's leader, though he absolutely was one. But to make such a GAWDA** deal out of one man's wrong choices boils my blood.
Well that's your tough luck! You can't actually stop people having that opinion about him not even someone who's a fan of John Lennon like me. I just don't care that much about politics and peace. I just like his songs and his zinging! I get irritated by people like you who use language like 'boils my blood' because you're so tied in with adulation towards John Lennon that something as inconsequential as people's negative opinions about what he did and said 40 odd yrs. ago gets turned into somekinda blashpemphous heresay! He was just a guy who had a talent for making music. Nothing more nothing less.
TheEggman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2012, 04:18 PM   #17
Apple Scruff
Sun King
 
Apple Scruff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 10, 2002
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 10,536

Default

Yes, but what if we sincerely agree with John's intentions and we're merely defending our reasoning? I don't need to be accused of being unreasonable and not accepting criticism if it's something I personally feel was tremendously positive and affected many in a good way. Do I?

In any case, I respectfully disagree with you, Eggman, but we've disagreed in the past with no hard feelings, eh?
__________________
"Let me live in you..." ~ John Lennon
Apple Scruff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2012, 09:26 PM   #18
wildewoman
Taxman
 
wildewoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 20, 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,895

Default

Ya know, I could pretty much refute all of these so-called facts but I'm not gonna waste my time. We did this quite thoroughly and eloquently already in a nice little thread called Myths lo many moons ago....the person who wrote it can go choke on the fast food of their choice for all the intellectual heft displayed.

Bor-ing...
__________________
Formerly we used to canonize our heroes. The modern method is to vulgarize them. Cheap editions of great books may be delightful, but cheap editions of great men are absolutely detestable.

--Oscar Wilde, The Critic as Artist

Last edited by wildewoman : Aug 22, 2012 at 09:27 PM.
wildewoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 02, 2012, 06:03 AM   #19
Snoopy66
Paperback Writer
 
Snoopy66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 11, 2009
Posts: 2,501

Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEggman View Post
Well that's your tough luck! You can't actually stop people having that opinion about him not even someone who's a fan of John Lennon like me. I just don't care that much about politics and peace. I just like his songs and his zinging! I get irritated by people like you who use language like 'boils my blood' because you're so tied in with adulation towards John Lennon that something as inconsequential as people's negative opinions about what he did and said 40 odd yrs. ago gets turned into somekinda blashpemphous heresay! He was just a guy who had a talent for making music. Nothing more nothing less.
I respectfully disagree as well. I see not harm to show great admiration for an artist - whoever it may be - and this not only for his work, but also for his personality and the influence he had during his lifetime.

And in all modesty, I think that John Lennon still represents a little bit more to many people than "just a guy who had talent for making music".

Snoopy
Snoopy66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 03, 2012, 02:38 AM   #20
TheEggman
Nowhere Man
 
TheEggman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 15, 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snoopy66 View Post
lifetime.

And in all modesty, I think that John Lennon still represents a little bit more to many people than "just a guy who had talent for making music".

Snoopy
Well it's a free world and if they wanna get carried away with all that kinda thing then fair enought. I'm pretty fed up of tbh. It all just sounds so shrill. If anything I prefer to downplay artists talents and successes. I mean I like most of Paul's music but it'd never say something like he has 'immense talent'. What good does that do anyone? All it does it ratchet up peoples feelings unnecessarily which then leads to tension and conflict when those feelings are hurt.
TheEggman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who Is Your Favorite Beatle thebeatles Abbey Road 93 Aug 24, 2012 11:19 AM
Brian & John: an item? Exploring their infamous "affair" 4iiiis Menlove Avenue 31 Feb 22, 2012 03:13 PM
My Visit With John Lennon At The Dakota, 1978 Apple Scruff Menlove Avenue 35 Jan 01, 2012 05:10 PM
John Lennon December 8th anniversary news articles Peregrine9 Menlove Avenue 14 Dec 16, 2011 08:11 PM
1968-09-18 - Rolling Stone Magazine - John Lennon Jerry The Word 0 Jun 16, 2003 07:13 AM


Advertisements

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Site Features
Search Links

  Advanced Search
Category Jump



BeatleMail

FREE E-MAIL
@ BEATLEMAIL.COM


Username


Password




New User Sign-Up!
Lost Password?
Beatles History




Donate
The costs of running our database and discussion forum are steadily rising. Any help we receive is greatly appreciated. Click HERE for more information about donating to BeatleLinks.
Extras
» Chat Room
» Current News
» Monthly Contest
» Interviews Database
» Random Site
» Banner Exchange
» F.A.Q.
» Advertise
» Credits
» Legal
» Contact Us
Copyright © 2000-2018 BeatleLinks
All Rights Reserved