 |  |
 |
|
May 27, 2003, 12:08 AM
|
#1
|
Fool On The Hill
Join Date: May 27, 2003
Posts: 14
|
Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
Let me clarify that question, okay?
I've read some comments from various
rock critics (Tim Riley for one) that
the Beatles reached their absolute
peak as a rock group when they made
Revolver in 1966. Jimmy Guterman, who
wrote a book called "The Best Rock 'n'
Roll Records of All Time" in 1992, claimed
that Sgt. Pepper was "a pretentious mess
and a bad influence on rock and roll in
general, although I do enjoy its audacity
and its inside jokes.". The same author
said that Please Please Me was the Beatles'
best album, ranked at number #13 in a list
of 100 rock albums (Guterman's number #1
pick was Rod Stewart's Every Picture Tells
a Story). Sorry to digress. I've also read
somewhere that John Lennon himself claimed that
the Beatles were at their very best in Hamburg
and at the Cavern before Brian Epstein cleaned
them up a bit. As for me, I generally like
everything the moptops recorded, give or take
a few songs. Here's my top ten fave Beatle
albums.
[1] Revolver
[2] Rubber Soul
[3] Help!
[4] The Beatles(White Album)
[5] Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
[6] Abbey Road
[7] A Hard Day's Night
[8] With the Beatles
[9] Beatles for Sale
[10] Yellow Submarine (my first Beatle album,
when I was only 7y/o!)
I love the Past Masters CDs, of course. The
other albums are good, too.
So, now I'd like to know if any of you Beatle
fans out there think they were better before
or after Sgt. Pepper, or that you don't care
either way? Thoughts? Opinions? Anyone?
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 12:25 AM
|
#2
|
Apple Scruff
Join Date: Dec 03, 2002
Location: El Cajon, CA, USA
Posts: 132
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
I like them before and after. I have gotten a little tired of Sgt. Pepper itself, though. I think that Abbey Road is a superior record, and I think that Rubber Soul is pure genius.
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 12:35 AM
|
#3
|
Fool On The Hill
Join Date: May 27, 2003
Posts: 14
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
Yeah, I agree. Rubber Soul is a work of
genius. Three of the songs are among my
absolute favorites; Nowhere Man, Norwegian
Wood and In My Life. Three of Lennon's best.
Abbey Road is the slickest sounding of all
the albums, it's reportedly George Martin's
favorite. Two of George Harrison's best
songs, Somewhere and Here Comes the Sun, are
on it. As for Sgt. Pepper, it's an excellent
album as opposed to a great one. It's not the
best "concept album", however. Not that crazy
about the idea of a whole album being a so-called
concept. Sounds too much like a pre-packaged
corperate "product" to me. But I love Pepper,
still.
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 12:57 AM
|
#4
|
Sgt. Pepper
Join Date: Apr 21, 2003
Location: Goloka Planet (ok, Italy for curious)
Posts: 4,466
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
Well I will try to explain,hope to be clear enough.
Every Beatles 'period' it's an important 'period',
none period can't exist without the others.
For example 'Rubber Soul' can't exist without
'Beatles for sale' and 'Revolver' withoout 'Rubber soul'.
I mean that all 'periods' (and albums by the way)are in a perfect line of a perfect evolution of a 'Fab' band. [img]graemlins/smile2.gif[/img]
[size="1"][ May 27, 2003, 01:58 AM: Message Edited By: chaitanya ][/size]
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 01:00 AM
|
#5
|
Day Tripper
Join Date: Feb 14, 2003
Location: Southfield, Michigan
Posts: 392
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
I love the Beatles all through 1960-1970, well when Ringo first joined that is in 1962 to 1970. I love it all, although I do agree Sgt. Pepper is at their greatest peak, along with Revolver. Rubber Soul is my favorite album though. But I'd say those three are my top favorites. I love Please Please Me to Abbey Road/Let It Be. [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img] * [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img] *
----------------------------
[img]graemlins/flower1.gif[/img]
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 01:00 AM
|
#6
|
Mr. Moonlight
Join Date: Apr 09, 2003
Posts: 751
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
Quote:
Originally Posted By ghfan1965:
I like them before and after. I have gotten a little tired of Sgt. Pepper itself, though. I think that Abbey Road is a superior record, and I think that Rubber Soul is pure genius.
|
<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Abbey Road is the best! I was just listening to it.
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 01:06 AM
|
#7
|
Fool On The Hill
Join Date: May 27, 2003
Posts: 14
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
Guess that's very true. Every album does
illustrate a musical evolution of sorts.
Revolver was definately designed to top
Rubber Soul. One could say that Pepper
was sorta made to top everything that
the Beatles recorded before. It was a
dramatic break from what they had done
before it. That includes the image, too.
The Beatles posing on the Pepper cover
certainly looked differant then the
innocent moptops they had been (represented
by the wax statues standing nearby). But
you're right that every Beatle album was a
progression their musical growth.
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 04:13 AM
|
#8
|
Sun King
Join Date: Feb 13, 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,373
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
I like them before and after as well. I like them best right in the middle actually, between '65-'67. My fav. album is definately Revolver but i also love the later stuff off the White Album and Abbey Road. Sgt. Pepper used to be my fav. album but it's dropped down to third or something. I'll always have a special place for Pepper though cuz that's what really got me hooked on the beatles. When I was about 12 I really listened to it for the first time and I loved it!
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 05:28 AM
|
#9
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 13, 2001
Location: Elmwood Park, IL USA
Posts: 12,512
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
I can't really say that the Beatles were ever at their peak. By that I mean, they were constantly growing and setting new standards for themselves and others. Sure, at times they faltered, but everyone does, at some point or another. I think they rocked their hardest in the early years and looked deeply into their souls in their later years. At different times, different parts of their careers appeal to me. Would they have ever reached their peak? My guess is yes, but I don't know when that would be.
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 06:50 AM
|
#10
|
Apple Scruff
Join Date: Jan 18, 2003
Posts: 132
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
I'd say they were better after Sgt. Pepper, but I don't see it as any "point" that before it music was better of worse. Of course it changed lot, but still.
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 09:28 AM
|
#11
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 13, 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 19,960
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
I love the Beatles always, but have hard time choosing a before & after, the before songs were new, exciting and fresh, all my favorite Beatle songs are on both ends of the spectrum, I will say this, my favorite albums are in this order "Rubber Soul", "Revolver", "Abbey Road", but they do not necessarily contain all my favorite songs by the Beatles [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 12:09 PM
|
#12
|
Nowhere Man
Join Date: May 26, 2003
Posts: 212
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
I like them both before and after, but I think my favorite Beatles songs came around the time of Rubber Soul and after... I'm not as big a fan of the early stuff as I am the later - the early stuff sounds more similar than the later songs do. What I mean is, the later songs are very much different from one song to the next, whereas the earlier stuff is more just the three minute pop song format.
I think the Beatles really came into their own after they stopped touring... When they started doing the music they couldn't reproduce live...
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 12:23 PM
|
#13
|
Dr. Robert
Join Date: Jan 09, 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,484
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
I've never been able to rank their albums and say "oh, this one is my favorite." I love them all, and at different times I get in the mood to listen to different albums. What makes the Beatles so special is that they connect with their fans on different levels. What may be the best to one person may be not so great to another.
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 12:48 PM
|
#14
|
Dr. Robert
Join Date: Oct 23, 2002
Location: Ciudad de México
Posts: 1,332
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
I like best their job after Sgt.Pepper (which is not the big deal, at least to me) but their early years were good too.
They just were differents before and after that album.
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 01:49 PM
|
#15
|
Wild Honey Pie
Join Date: Apr 01, 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 553
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
Sgt Pepper was a definate departure, but I don't think it's necessarily the best, I'm not the biggest fan of it anyway. Rubber Soul is my absolute favourite album and it comes before the supposed monumental Pepper. Then again I also love the White Album, so I'll just have to be a fence sitter and say that the Beatles remained strnf throughout their entire recording career!
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 02:11 PM
|
#16
|
Nowhere Man
Join Date: Apr 08, 2003
Posts: 253
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
I think Sgt. Pepper was kind of the peak of grandiose, ornate music that they could make like with all the effects and production on it. Before, they were building up to that point of Sgt. Pepper and afterwards they somewhat went back to the simpler music. So, in my opinion, they were good before and after Sgt. Pepper, although I don't listen to Pepper that much anymore. My favorite albums would have to be Revolver and Abbey Road, one album before and the other way after Sgt. Pepper.
[size="1"][ May 27, 2003, 03:12 PM: Message Edited By: Hari Krishna ][/size]
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 02:19 PM
|
#17
|
Apple Scruff
Join Date: Dec 03, 2002
Location: El Cajon, CA, USA
Posts: 132
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
I agree with the statement that they never really reached their peak, because they were always reinventing their sound. That is what made them such a great band.
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 08:16 PM
|
#18
|
Old Brown Shoe
Join Date: Mar 16, 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,083
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
I really prefer the period before Sgt. Pepper, but I don't think any album could be regarded as the Beatles' "peak." They were always reinventing themselves, and their "best work" is all a matter of personal taste.
To me, the Rubber Soul & Revolver tunes hold up much better individually than the Sgt. Pepper ones, and everything after Sgt. Pepper feels a bit disjointed. But others might say the White Album or Abbey Road blow the earlier albums away. [img]graemlins/shakehead3.gif[/img]
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 11:16 PM
|
#19
|
Apple Scruff
Join Date: Jan 10, 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 137
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
I think they really improved during the movie
A Hard Days Night there music really improved and Songwriting too. I love all there Albums starting with the Music of A Hard Days Night up until Abbey Road !!! I not really keen on the Please Please Me album or the With The Beatles its just ok but they really improved in 1964 during Beatlemania!!!
|
|
|
May 27, 2003, 11:25 PM
|
#20
|
Apple Scruff
Join Date: Mar 24, 2003
Location: my house
Posts: 149
|
Re: Were the Beatles better before or after Sgt. Pepper?
Before.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:06 PM.
| |
 |  |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
The costs of running our database and discussion forum are steadily rising. Any help we receive is greatly appreciated. Click HERE for more information about donating to BeatleLinks. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|