 |  |
 |
Nov 08, 2009, 09:26 AM
|
#1
|
Little Child
Join Date: Jun 14, 2007
Posts: 58
|
yesterday...and today question
one thing that alays puzzled me and i know there is a book based on capital's
selections...when usa needed 3 songs to fill yat..why didnt they just take paperback writer, rain..two songs already out there...it didnt bother them before to put singles on their butchered albums...they could have even put
a song from ppm that didnt make early beatles like misery? i know misery doesnt fit but that never bothered capital fatcats before...
sie libt dich even,,
i sorta grew up with usa albums actually older siblings bought the albums...
i rember thinking wow only two john songs on revolver..i had no idea about british albums till later on...i thought john had crumbled on jesus remark ha ha..hey i was real young...
|
|
|
Nov 08, 2009, 09:34 AM
|
#2
|
Wild Honey Pie
Join Date: Sep 24, 2009
Location: the hills of Tennessee
Posts: 601
|
Well, actually, I think the people who put these albums together actually did do some thinking. Most of the Capitol albums--at least to my ears--feel like the songs work together as a collection.
In paticular, Yesterday...and Today is a collection that makes sense when I hear it. The Revolver tracks are not keyboard-driven or extremely experimental. Of course, they basically took whatever EMI London would give them, which in this case was the most "traditional Beatle-sounding" tracks from Revolver.
As for the "Paperback Writer/Rain" single, that's a good point. It would have fit OK on Yesterday...and Today, but I always felt like "Paperback Writer" sounded like an attempt to recreate a riff-driven rocker like "Day Tripper", and I think it would have sounded a little redundant to have had both of those on one Capitol album.
__________________
 Dwight
"There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be."
|
|
|
Nov 09, 2009, 08:55 PM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 11, 2005
Location: Beautiful Downtown Burbank, CA
Posts: 6,043
|
Yeah... I always felt that "Y&T" flowed well as an ALBUM.
When I was a kid, I appreciated it as a "compilation" LP (the album title kind'a gave that away). But it was hard to notice.
As far as the "Paperback Writer"/'Rain" question... Hmmmm, don't know. But I don't think those two tracks would really have worked as well on that album as the UK "Revolver" tracks that were used.
|
|
|
Nov 09, 2009, 08:57 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 11, 2005
Location: Beautiful Downtown Burbank, CA
Posts: 6,043
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by yellowbulldog
i sorta grew up with usa albums actually older siblings bought the albums...
i rember thinking wow only two john songs on revolver..i had no idea about british albums till later on...i thought john had crumbled on jesus remark ha ha..hey i was real young...
|
I grew up with the Capitol Albums, as well. The fact that George had more songs on "Revolver" than John did blew my mind a little, too. 
Last edited by 62hofner : Nov 09, 2009 at 08:57 PM.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:36 PM.
| |
 |  |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
The costs of running our database and discussion forum are steadily rising. Any help we receive is greatly appreciated. Click HERE for more information about donating to BeatleLinks. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|