BeatleLinks LogoNav Panel New Sites Cool Sites Top Rated Fab Forum Add A Site Link To Us Revolution Radio New Products



Go Back   BeatleLinks Fab Forum > Beatles Forums > Abbey Road


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Feb 23, 2010, 07:31 AM   #1
Lucy
Moderator
 
Lucy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 05, 2000
Location: London
Posts: 9,749


Send a message via AIM to Lucy Send a message via MSN to Lucy
Exclamation I believe in yesterday

I believe in yesterday

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/...s-simon-cowell

Two historians have won research funding to study the financing of pop music from the era of Elvis to punk

Pop music in 2010 appears to be dominated by the internet and Simon Cowell. EMI's recent announcement of a 1.75bn annual loss shows the once-dominant company has been badly hit by illegal downloading and the move away from album sales to single digital tracks. It is an industry that changes fast; big names soon become passe. All of which makes it appropriate that two academics looking into the financing of pop music between 1950 and 1975 are both historians. That period, from Elvis to punk, does already feel like history.

The Economic and Social Research Council evidently accepted the argument put forward by Dr Terry Gourvish, director of the business history unit at the London School of Economics, and Dr Richard Coopey, senior lecturer in history at the University of Wales, Aberystwyth, that an industry for which Britain has remained one of the two global epicentres is worthy of study. The "pop docs" have been granted 290,758 for a three-year project.

What happened from the mid-50s to the mid-70s was revolutionary, Gourvish says. "It involved the fragmentation of an earlier business model in which large companies dominated music production and music sales. The process affected the US in particular and was facilitated by a significant increase in demand for manufactured pop music from teenagers with money to spend a new phenomenon. At the same time, new technologies had improved the quality and reduced the cost and scale of production."

Vinyl had replaced shellac, in other words. "As a result," Gourvish says, "*singles and long-playing albums (LPs) came to the fore, and independent record companies increased their market share." These shifts were accompanied by a rise in the importance of managers, independent record producers and labels, and of entrepreneurial artists asserting their right to a greater share in decision-making and profits.

Gourvish is in his 60s and Coopey in his late 50s, so both are old enough to remember when "Beatle-mania" took first Britain and then America by storm. "The Beatles were pivotal in the move away from major record companies dictating to artists *everything from how much they were going to be paid to how much time they could spend in the studio," Coopey says. "Their popularity gave them the power to dictate terms to EMI."

Their manager, Brian Epstein, he says, "was honest in a world where accounting practices often operated on the limits of legality". After Epstein died in 1967, things changed. "You could argue that the Beatles lacked any business cohesion after he died.

"Epstein has had a bad press. He's been portrayed as a furniture salesman who just stumbled across them. But," Coopey adds,"Epstein took the revolutionary step of setting up the Beatles' own publishing house."

Unfortunately, he made two major *mistakes, says Gourvish. One was to allow music publisher Dick James to keep 51% of Northern Songs, the company set up to publish Lennon-McCartney compositions, which means that Paul McCartney gets no money from the early songs. The other, he says, was to sell for just $1m the *merchandising rights for the group's American tour in 1964. "But nobody could have predicted just how big the Beatles were going to be across the Atlantic. In this country, the Beatles craze was a steadily building process. In America it just took off. Not even Elvis had had that kind of merchandising potential."

American entrepreneurs may have been making money out of Beatles mugs and wigs, but the mid-60s were a low point for America's major record companies as they struggled to compete with a succession of mega-bands from the UK. The US recovery was built on Tamla Motown and the soul sounds popularised in northern clubs such as the Twisted Wheel in Manchester and the Wigan Casino. There then followed another British boom built on progressive ("prog") rock with bands such as Genesis and Pink Floyd and glam rock with T Rex, David Bowie, Sweet and Gary Glitter.

The researchers were helped in their investigations by Gourvish's brother, Tony, who had worked in the business and helped to provide introductions in a notoriously closed world. So, as well as *examining company reports, archives and autobiographies, the historians have been able to talk to independent producers, such as Joe Boyd and Jonathan King, and also key figures like Kenny Lynch the singer who became a writer and a music publisher "a template the Beatles *followed," says Gourvish.

"The difficulty with interviews," he adds, "is that many of the key entrepreneurs of the period, like Epstein, are dead. Of those who are alive, most are pensioners and few remember the 1960s clearly."

The curtain came down on the 60s with the Beatles' Abbey Road album, named after the studios that have just been put on the market to help stem EMI's debts. An iconic vinyl album looks more than ever like a relic of history.
__________________
=^..^=
Lucy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 05:21 AM   #2
cuttingedgedjs
Nowhere Man
 
cuttingedgedjs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 12, 2009
Posts: 238
Default

Awesome post! Good to see that I'm old enough to see grants being made for the study of the historical significance of my music lol.
__________________
-Craig

Stuff I write about The Beatles
http://www.cuttingedgedjs.com/blog/c...y/the-beatles/
cuttingedgedjs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
We believe in yesterday... why the Beatles still rule the world oldbeatlechick I Read The News Today 6 Apr 16, 2009 11:16 AM
Beatles' Yesterday is a cover... instant karla And Your Bird Can Sing 21 Sep 04, 2006 04:20 PM
Yesterday and today HMVNipper I Read The News Today 5 Jan 29, 2004 04:04 AM
actually, I heard the news yesterday starchild01 I Read The News Today 1 Oct 16, 2003 03:48 PM
Sir Paul says he gets only a small cut of Yesterday proceeds beatlemethisbeatlemethat Red Rose Speedway 6 May 18, 2001 02:32 AM


Advertisements

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Site Features
Search Links

  Advanced Search
Category Jump



BeatleMail

FREE E-MAIL
@ BEATLEMAIL.COM


Username


Password




New User Sign-Up!
Lost Password?
Beatles History




Donate
The costs of running our database and discussion forum are steadily rising. Any help we receive is greatly appreciated. Click HERE for more information about donating to BeatleLinks.
Extras
» Chat Room
» Current News
» Monthly Contest
» Interviews Database
» Random Site
» Banner Exchange
» F.A.Q.
» Advertise
» Credits
» Legal
» Contact Us
Copyright © 2000-2020 BeatleLinks
All Rights Reserved