Unfair Link Labeling

You are linking to a site that is illegal to own or operate in many countries without properly labeling that link of it's true contents, contents which if seen on your content decription, people might not go to.

It is unfair to direct someone to a site which has views that may or may not be illegal to espouse in their own countries without informing them of the possible illegal content of the sight before they enter it.

Your Rethinking John Lennon's Assassination should properly convey the contents of what is inside, which should more properly read:

This re-examines the circumstances of Lennon's death and believes Lennon was actually killed by Jewish Conspirators because they felt after returning to the public eye, he would expose the Holocaust as a lie.

Please note that it is illegal in Israel and in about half the countries of Europe, including Germany, France, Spain, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Poland, and Austria, to dispute Holocaust claims.

To not properly identify that link could cause Jewish readers of Beatlelinks to enter a site that is anathema to them and would actually contribute traffic to a site that they would have no intention of supporting if the appropriate contents of that site was listed beforehand.

This email does not pose the same risks because it clearly indicates the content of the site, unlike the contents of your own link. Please change the contents of that link to reflect it's true character.

And I thought I was stubborn... [img]graemlins/images/icons/rolleyes.gif[/img]

Start up your own links site and then you can "properly" lablel whatever you want.

Please could you please just read the site without damning it due to it's suggestive contents. I did and realised that you're talking nothing but rubbish.