PDA

View Full Version : Paul Talks About Last Meeting With George


Siobhan
Apr 07, 2003, 06:17 AM
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12817634&method=full&siteid=50143

"I'M SO PROUD TO HAVE KNOWN GEORGE" Apr 7 2003

By Brian Reade

THE only song Paul McCartney sings on this world tour that is not his own is the one Frank Sinatra called the greatest love ballad ever written.

He performs Something alone, on a ukulele and, as he does, the huge bank of video screens around the stage throw up his brother Mike's informal black-and-white pictures of the song's author, George Harrison.

The poignancy of the delivery makes the hair on the back of 18,000 necks go rigid.

Although McCartney has lost people close to him since he was a young teenager, the death of George 16 months ago came as a shattering blow. "It was different from my mum's and John's and Linda's because theirs were sudden and we knew George had been very ill for a while.

"But it was very, very sad because I loved him so much," says McCartney in his Barcelona dressing-room, still choked by the loss of the life-long pal he persuaded John Lennon to let into The Beatles all those years ago.

"I'd just been through cancer with Linda and here I was going through it all over again with a mate of 50 years. He wasn't my immediate family but he almost was. He'd always felt like my little brother.

He takes a breath, focuses on a point in the distance, mutters "What a lovely boy" then carries on. "The last time I met him, he was very sick and I held his hand for four hours. As I was doing it I was thinking 'I've never held his hand before, ever. This is not what two Liverpool fellas do, no matter how well you know each other'.

"I kept thinking, 'he's going to smack me here'. But he didn't. He just stroked my hand with his thumb and I thought 'Ah, this is OK, this is life. It's tough but it's lovely. That's how it is'. I knew George before I knew any of the others and I loved that man. I'm so proud to have known him.

"Still, as sad as it was, you take the great bit, which was that last time you saw him, and that's what you remember. That and all the other lovely memories."

I ASK now that John and George have gone, whether he and Ringo ever joke with each other about who is next.

"It's not worth thinking about, is it? When your number's up, it's up. So live your life. I don't worry too much about it. I was walking down the street in London the other day and some guy said 'Eh, Paul! No, no, you shouldn't be doing this. I don't like this. Where's your minder?' He was telling me off like he was my dad.

"But I enjoy life, I always have. I go to the pictures on my own, get on buses, even in New York. People are always going on at me for using the London Underground. But I use it all the time. I just wander off.

"I prefer to live life the way it should be and not worry too much because when the great man upstairs wants you, he'll have you."

Forty years after The Beatles had their first No.1, McCartney is on the UK leg of a sell-out world tour which is smashing box office records and making him the highest-earning celebrity in the world. I ask if the man who famously wrote a parody about being 64 ever thought he'd be doing this at 60 and he shakes his head and laughs.

"When I was a kid in The Beatles, I didn't think I'd be doing this at 30. Back then nobody really lasted past their 20s.

"If you'd have said to me back then that I'd be playing for the Queen in her garden when I was 60, I might have laughed at you. But I did and I'm here still doing it and I don't feel too bad.

"As long as people are so interested they want to pay to see you, then it's cool." This 16-country tour, which arrives in Manchester on Thursday, is his first for 10 years and when it ends in Liverpool on June 1, he will have played 91 concerts, performing songs 3,276 times.

He is looking and singing like a man many years his junior and with his 35-year-old wife Heather Mills on his arm, it's clear he is enjoying a second wind.

So how old does he feel? "I don't feel any age, I never have. Those 30, 40, 50, 60 landmark birthdays never meant anything to me. I treat them all the same and it seems to work out like that. Life is really good right now, so why worry about things?

"When I was with Wings I used to worry about the shadow of The Beatles. So I wouldn't do any of their songs. Now I don't care. I just look at my whole career and choose anything I fancy doing. Which is why I'm doing 23 Beatles songs every night. It's great for everyone."

HIS lack of self-awareness, plus the talented backing group he has assembled, allow McCartney to turn in some of the best performances of his life and win the kind of reviews he would have killed for when he was with Wings.

At times, the criticism of that group was savage, particularly where the vocal performance of his first wife Linda was concerned. How did somebody feted one minute as half of the most talented songwriting team on earth cope with sudden accusations of naffness? He says: "I've learned that if you try something different, you are going to get knocked. If I had just carried on doing my Beatles stuff maybe I wouldn't have got knocked. But I wanted to see if I could do something different.

"It was hard at first with Wings, because we were a bit rough. But there was a time when The Beatles weren't very good. The difference was we were being bad in private, whereas Wings were being it in public.

"It's what happens when you take risks. I like taking risks. Half the time I don't know why I'm doing it. But I know that if The Beatles hadn't taken risks there would have been no Sergeant Pepper."

At a conservative estimate, the lad from a Liverpool council estate who left school at the first opportunity is worth £700million. Last year, when his US tour grossed £70million, no other performer earned more than him. And it is something he is immensely proud of.

"When I read about things like that I think, that's not me. Heather said to me this morning, 'I don't think of you as rich, you know.' And I said, 'I don't either.' But I am. And the best thing about it is being able to help friends and relatives with health problems.

"We just had a friend of Heather's who was stuck in an NHS hospital. She was going to be in over Christmas and I said 'Get her private'. They did the operation that night and she was home for Christmas. It sounds a bit goody-goody but that's the real buzz I get out of money."

So his massive fortune doesn't embarrass him? "Not at all. When I left school I set out to get a job and earn good money if I could. I'm no different from anyone else. Some people think making all this money is uncool. I don't. I'm trying to do what I do to the very best of my ability. I'm not embarrassed if that means I earn loads."

The last time The Beatles played live was in 1968. They played roughly a dozen songs. On this tour McCartney plays 36. But the real difference now is he can hear himself. "At the end with The Beatles we couldn't hear ourselves with all the screaming. Our sound was going through little amps and baseball speakers in these huge stadiums and it was just a joke. So we just took the Mickey."

Paul laughs as he recalls: "John would be totally pissing about on the piano, whacking his arm up and down the keyboard and we were in hysterics.

NOW we've got these gigantic speakers so no matter how loud they scream, we're going to win."

There is a sense that McCartney is returning to Britain just when we need him. With the country at war we all need cheering up and he is keen to oblige.

"We're here to lift people's spirits. We're musicians, not politicians. I'd prefer peace to war and I agree with those people who went on the marches, because there was no second resolution.

"But it is a complex issue and it's happening now. So I'm not going to say that our boys shouldn't be in there when they're laying their lives on the line. I've got relatives out there so I'm not going to say anything that would lower their morale. But yes, peace would definitely be preferable."

The Beatles were widely attributed with lifting America out of depression after John F Kennedy was assassinated and McCartney did it again last year after 9/11. They loved him for the support he showed New York and they rewarded him by breaking box office records in 21 cities.

The Yanks claimed the tour, with all those classic Fab Four numbers, reminded them of a better time. Which, when you think about it, has always been the function of The Beatles.

But this return to Britain's stadiums after 10 years is all about a revitalised McCartney plundering his untouchable back catalogue and letting rip. If you never saw The Beatles, commit crimes to get a ticket because this is as close as it will ever get.

And the highest compliment I can pay McCartney is that his performance was so mesmeric I didn't notice one thumbs-up all night.

beatlelover45223
Apr 07, 2003, 08:26 AM
Thanks for posting this, good to get some Paul perspective on life and it's value, and the new tour news

AnotherGirl83
Apr 07, 2003, 08:37 AM
Thanks for posting this! Great article... I miss George graemlins/cry5.gif *... You know, the friendship the Beatles had among them was really, really special; even with the hard feelings, the break-up... it was just special graemlins/cry2.gif

Jerry
Apr 07, 2003, 09:44 AM
Originally Posted By Siobhan:
The last time The Beatles played live was in 1968. They played roughly a dozen songs.<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">I'd love to have a bootleg of that show. It's amazing how little research some people do when they're writing. I mean, the correct info can be had with like no effort at all.

Penny Lane
Apr 07, 2003, 10:20 AM
that made me cry. graemlins/cry5.gif

L'Angelo Misterioso
Apr 07, 2003, 10:37 AM
Those guys really loved each other and I'm glad that they are not trying to hide it.

Thanks for the article Siobhan.

L'Angelo Misterioso
Apr 07, 2003, 10:38 AM
Originally Posted By Jerry:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Originally Posted By Siobhan:
The last time The Beatles played live was in 1968. They played roughly a dozen songs.<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">I'd love to have a bootleg of that show. It's amazing how little research some people do when they're writing. I mean, the correct info can be had with like no effort at all.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">So true. graemlins/shakehead1.gif

beatlebangs1964
Apr 07, 2003, 11:09 AM
What a lovely and moving article and thank you for posting this.

ChicagoMolly
Apr 07, 2003, 01:24 PM
Originally Posted By L'Angelo Misterioso:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Originally Posted By Jerry:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Originally Posted By Siobhan:
The last time The Beatles played live was in 1968. They played roughly a dozen songs.<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">I'd love to have a bootleg of that show. It's amazing how little research some people do when they're writing. I mean, the correct info can be had with like no effort at all.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">So true. graemlins/shakehead1.gif </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">I am definately missing something, but being to lazy to search out the answer, I will just ask here: What part of the writer's statement is wrong?
graemlins/blush1.gif

L'Angelo Misterioso
Apr 07, 2003, 01:29 PM
Originally Posted By ChicagoMolly:
I am definately missing something, but being to lazy to search out the answer, I will just ask here: What part of the writer's statement is wrong?
graemlins/blush1.gif <font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">The Beatles did not play live in 1968. The last tour they did was in 1966 and the last time thet played live was January 30th 1969 on the roof of Apple building in London. images/icons/smile.gif

[ Apr 07, 2003, 01:30 PM: Message Edited By: L'Angelo Misterioso ]

Savoy Truffle
Apr 07, 2003, 01:46 PM
Originally posted by Rellevart:
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted By Siobhan:
He takes a breath, focuses on a point in the distance, mutters "What a lovely boy" then carries on.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok, that bit just did me in. <font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Me too. graemlins/cry5.gif Actually a lot of what Paul said about George did it!

Thanks for that, Siobhan. It was very moving. They did I think really love each other and I'm sure any differences they ever had probably melted away during the time they held hands.(If not sooner)

kc
Apr 07, 2003, 03:31 PM
Wonderful article; makes me emotional and misty-eyed...

Magill
Apr 07, 2003, 03:50 PM
I ASK now that John and George have gone, whether he and Ringo ever joke with each other about who is next.<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Oh, I'm so sure! graemlins/images/icons/rolleyes.gif
Scenario
Ringo: You go, Paul.
Paul: No, after you, Ritch.
Ringo: No...I insist!
Paul: Age before beauty...
graemlins/laugh2.gif

The rest of it was really touching, though. I liked the hand holding bit. I wonder if Ringo will ever share his last moments with the public.

MissusLennon
Apr 07, 2003, 07:33 PM
That was beautiful, thanks so much for the article Si!

I must say, he is one amazing man graemlins/thumbsup2.gif

Hari's Chick
Apr 07, 2003, 09:32 PM
"He'd always felt like my little brother."

And on George's behalf....
only eight months younger!! images/icons/wink.gif

Very sweet article, thanks for posting this.

bitagirl
Apr 07, 2003, 09:39 PM
awwwwwwwwwwwww! All that George stuff started to make me tear up...just what I need before I go to bed!

old_moon_shining
Apr 07, 2003, 10:37 PM
Originally Posted By Magill:
I wonder if Ringo will ever share his last moments with the public.<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Maybe he just respects George and his last moments with him too much.

Rellevart
Apr 08, 2003, 12:51 AM
Originally Posted By Siobhan:
He takes a breath, focuses on a point in the distance, mutters "What a lovely boy" then carries on. <font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Ok, that bit just did me in.

Lynner
Apr 08, 2003, 04:13 AM
Originally Posted By old_moon_shining:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Originally Posted By Magill:
I wonder if Ringo will ever share his last moments with the public.<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Maybe he just respects George and his last moments with him too much.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Dunno so much that it's out of respect, but rather he's not as open as Paul with sharing such stories.

LuvLennon
Apr 08, 2003, 07:00 AM
This is such a nice article, sad yet touching. Thanks for posting it Siobhan

NovaLee
Apr 08, 2003, 01:39 PM
That was a really good article. Thanks for posting it Siobhan!
i strated getting teary-eyed like a few other people here. i don't get that way very often, but when he was talking about George, it made me so sad.
then the part about lifting people's spirits made me a little emotional, because i know if it weren't for The Beatles, i couldn't have gotten through certain things in my life lately. just listening to their music and watching their movies(well, i only own two-yellow sub and a hard day's night) makes me forget about my problems and it makes me happy.
The Beatles make me happy. images/icons/smile.gif

bearkat77
Apr 09, 2003, 12:07 AM
Thank you for posting this article, Siobhan.

ChicagoMolly
Apr 09, 2003, 12:34 AM
Originally Posted By L'Angelo Misterioso:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Originally Posted By ChicagoMolly:
I am definately missing something, but being to lazy to search out the answer, I will just ask here: What part of the writer's statement is wrong?
graemlins/blush1.gif <font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">The Beatles did not play live in 1968. The last tour they did was in 1966 and the last time thet played live was January 30th 1969 on the roof of Apple
building in London. images/icons/smile.gif </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Not only too lazy to search out the answer, but too lazy to turn on my little brain as well! Thanks for waking me up!!

L'Angelo Misterioso
Apr 09, 2003, 06:49 AM
Originally Posted By ChicagoMolly:
Not only too lazy to search out the answer, but too lazy to turn on my little brain as well! Thanks for waking me up!!<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">But then again it's good to turn off your mind, relax and float downstream every now and then isn't it? images/icons/wink.gif

You're welcome!

Johnna Lynn
Apr 09, 2003, 11:44 AM
Will Paul leave nothing sacred and private? No one else is tellingus about their last meeting with a dying man. GEORGE is his name, not Paul. graemlins/fire2.gif

Rellevart
Apr 09, 2003, 11:51 AM
Originally Posted By Johnna Lynn:
Will Paul leave nothing sacred and private? <font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Everybody has different ideas about what should be private and what you should talk about. I think it's a sweet story and I don't have any problem with him sharing it. I also wouldn't have had any problem if he hadn't wanted to. It's not really my choice to make. images/icons/smile.gif

Magill
Apr 09, 2003, 01:06 PM
Paul has always been open when asked about things. Remember...?:
Reporter: "Have you ever used drugs?"
Paul: pauses "Yes."
I don't think he'll ever share his last moments with Linda because there was never any question regarding their relationship. It was successful and very loving. Everyone knew it. Just as Ringo's was with George. That's why Ringo always just says about his last moments with George, "I loved George and George loved me." It wouldn't bother me whether he'd say any more about it. I think that pretty much says it all. images/icons/smile.gif

Johnna Lynn
Apr 09, 2003, 01:10 PM
Rellevart- Have you EVER read anyone as "correct as Macca? All our fellow fans seem to "feel" as if Paul did this George coverage for THEM. He answers to himself in the end. I refuse to accept his sharing as unselfish.

Rellevart
Apr 09, 2003, 01:13 PM
Originally Posted By Johnna Lynn:
Rellevart- Have you EVER read anyone as "correct as Macca? All our fellow fans seem to "feel" as if Paul did this George coverage for THEM. He answers to himself in the end. I refuse to accept his sharing as unselfish.<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">I'm not really quite sure what you're getting at here. Maybe I'm just being dense, but I honestly don't understand, sorry.

Johnna Lynn
Apr 09, 2003, 01:14 PM
Paul himself would tell you what seems to be open was STUPID as far as drug use. He had put it back on the MEDIA to NOT report that. He knows better now, Maggil.

Hari's Chick
Apr 09, 2003, 02:39 PM
Originally Posted By Johnna Lynn:
Open? pragmatic? Your perception, not mine. <font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">I didn't join Links to offer your perception. images/icons/wink.gif

Just kiddin...sorry, couldn't resist. Don't worry so much about this. You seem pretty upset.

Hari's Chick
Apr 09, 2003, 02:41 PM
By the way, welcome to Links graemlins/wave1.gif

Nerk Sister
Apr 09, 2003, 02:50 PM
I see no problem with Paul sharing his last meeting with George if he wants to. And he has shared quiet a lot of Linda's last moments with the press to.

I don't think Paul can win in this situation. If he wasn't saying anything I guarantee you someone would be criticizing him for that.

Hari's Chick
Apr 10, 2003, 12:01 AM
I agree~ while I wouldn't have talked about it, I think it is okay for Paul. That's just Paul, very open and pragmatic. But that's the Paul we love, wouldn't want him any other way. images/icons/smile.gif

Johnna Lynn
Apr 10, 2003, 12:22 AM
I am aware paul has lived his adult life in the media. What happened when Linda passed? Private. He is like all of us. He picks and chooses carefully. He is unstoppable and he knows it. I am a huge fan of his. I dont let that taint what I know to be true. He answers to no one but himself. He has the $ the media attention. How do you know how macca is? Open? pragmatic? Your perception, not mine. John is smiling. :shakehead4:Also for Brian- Paul is very smug in the Beatles Anthology when he states Sinatra credited Lennon/Mccartney with writing Something

[ Apr 09, 2003, 12:29 PM: Message Edited By: Johnna Lynn ]

Magill
Apr 10, 2003, 12:22 AM
I think Paul just wants everyone to know that George and he had made amends and Paul feels good about the sense of closure he got from George. And that George actually had loved him in spite of their past differences. Something he wasn't able to get resolved from John before he passed. graemlins/sad1.gif *
IMO, he wanted to share this tidbit with the world and to perhaps re-assure us fans.

Savoy Truffle
Apr 10, 2003, 12:26 AM
I agree. I think Magill hit the nail on the head. And I think it's only the kind of thing Paul would talk about. I would also have kept it to myself also out of respect for George as a private man but Paul has always been a bit on the gushy side and seems to need to tell the public intimate details. And for us fans it's a lovely mental picture of two lifelong friends who had made amends. images/icons/smile.gif

[ Apr 09, 2003, 12:29 PM: Message Edited By: Savoy Truffle ]

Rellevart
Apr 10, 2003, 12:47 AM
Originally Posted By Johnna Lynn:
He answers to no one but himself. <font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">And he should answer to who then? You? Me? In the end, none of us answers to anybody but ourselves, or perhaps God, if one believes that way.

Sexy_Sadie
Apr 10, 2003, 01:38 AM
Originally Posted By Magill:
[QUOTE] I wonder if Ringo will ever share his last moments with the public.<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">He shared a story on Jay Leno about one of his last meetings with George. George was really weak and sick, and Ringo was telling him that he had to go visit his daughter in the States, who was due for surgery. George said something like, "Would you like me to come?" Awwwwwww it was sooooo touching and sad the way that he told it.

Sexy_Sadie
Apr 10, 2003, 01:44 AM
Originally Posted By Johnna Lynn:
He answers to no one but himself. He has the $ the media attention. How do you know how macca is? Open? pragmatic? Your perception, not mine. John is smiling. :shakehead4:Also for Brian- Paul is very smug in the Beatles Anthology when he states Sinatra credited Lennon/Mccartney with writing Something<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Yes, but why should he NOT answer to no one but himself??? When he answers to other people, he is labeled a "people-pleaser" and that he should be more like John, or Bob Dylan. When he does what HE wants, he gets looked down on as well. I just think that he has attained SOOOO much success and has done so much good with his life that he has every right to have the choice as to what he shares and doesn't share with the public! I credit him for NOT being arrogant, as he so easily could be since he is so well-loved! images/icons/smile.gif Just my two cents!

beatlebangs1964
Apr 10, 2003, 09:12 AM
Hear hear, Rell, Sexy Sadie and Hari's Chick!

Paul has respected George's privacy all along. Remember the May 2001 interviews with Larry King and Charlie Rose when Paul said he would not go out on nationwide television and divulge anything he and George privately discussed? Later in 2001 he said the same thing to HoWEIRD Stern on his show.

Paul shared the basic, general and kept anything of REAL intimate, private content just that - private. He DID respect George all along and his comments were tasteful, relevant and very kind and considerate. It is only natural that Paul would come forward publicly with some information, but what he did share, I am sure, is but a fraction of what took place during their final meeting.

Anyroad, I think it is a lovely story that reflects well on both former Beatles, Paul AND George!


Originally Posted By Sexy_Sadie:


Yes, but why should he NOT answer to no one but himself??? When he answers to other people, he is labeled a "people-pleaser" and that he should be more like John, or Bob Dylan. When he does what HE wants, he gets looked down on as well. I just think that he has attained SOOOO much success and has done so much good with his life that he has every right to have the choice as to what he shares and doesn't share with the public! I credit him for NOT being arrogant, as he so easily could be since he is so well-loved! images/icons/smile.gif Just my two cents!<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">

Well said, Sexy! Why SHOULD Paul answer to anybody other than himself? Yeah, we love him, his music and have benefitted from what he has to offer, but to be fair about it, Paul does not owe US anything. He chooses to give, to produce, to provide. That makes me love him all the more.

Even if Paul were a "people pleaser," is that a BAD thing? I don't think it is. He is an entertainer and in his line of work, he is doing what he thinks people would like to see/hear him do. He even said on Jay Leno's show last year that he "puts himself in the mind of his audience" and thinks, "now, if I were going to see Paul McCartney, what would I like to see him do?" Paul is, IMHO a very generous individual.

Paul has made peace with his past. Instead of dodging the Beatle claim to fame that put him where he is today, Paul has graciously accepted it, made it part of his concerts and nobody could ask for a more gracious artist to interview. Yeah, I too credit Paul for NOT being arrogant - I agree with his self-assessement that he's "just an ordinary bloke who paints." Paul is, IMHO humble to a large extent about his talent and has given back many times over. Who gave a free concert in NY for the people most directly affected by 9/11/01 - SIR PAUL! Who offered words of comfort publicly after George Harrison died? That's right - PAUL! Who graciously allowed some photographs of his wedding to be made public and who offered to share within what he felt was reasonable with the world at large? You guessed it - PAUL!

Paul McCartney is, IMHO the ultimate success story. I don't mean just his talents, fame and material success. I mean that he is a family man, has a solid core, has his head on straight and I think is truly a good person. Yeah, I think Paul McCartney is a class act and I have the deepest respect for him.

[ Apr 10, 2003, 09:15 AM: Message Edited By: beatlebangs1964 ]

BeatNick
Apr 10, 2003, 11:47 AM
Ok, I think this is a riot!

People... he said he held the guy's hand. That's it! He didn't tell you everything that happened in the whole four hours. LOL!

Get a grip!

I think he is respecting George's privacy by not telling us the whole thing. Wasn't there something else he was on or some article where he said he wasn't going to say much because George was a private person? I'm sure there was, but can't put my finger on it at the moment.

Anyway, shoo shoo you evil Paul haters! Take your hatred some place else! LOL!!! How would you like to be in the public 24 hours a day & be forced to grieve in public over the loss of a good friend? Relax! Ringo & Paul have done fine in my meager little speck of an opinion.

graemlins/peace.gif
Nick

Nerk Sister
Apr 10, 2003, 06:59 PM
Originally Posted By BeatNick:

Relax! Ringo & Paul have done fine in my meager little speck of an opinion.
graemlins/peace.gif
Nick<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">graemlins/clap2.gif graemlins/clap2.gif

Sexy_Sadie
Apr 11, 2003, 12:26 AM
Originally Posted By beatlebangs1964:
I[/i] were going to see Paul McCartney, what would I like to see him do?" Paul is, IMHO a very generous individual.
<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Exxxxxactly! images/icons/smile.gif

Sexy_Sadie
Apr 11, 2003, 12:27 AM
Originally Posted By BeatNick:
Ok, I think this is a riot!

People... he said he held the guy's hand. That's it! He didn't tell you everything that happened in the whole four hours. LOL!

Get a grip!

I think he is respecting George's privacy by not telling us the whole thing. Wasn't there something else he was on or some article where he said he wasn't going to say much because George was a private person? I'm sure there was, but can't put my finger on it at the moment.

Anyway, shoo shoo you evil Paul haters! Take your hatred some place else! LOL!!! How would you like to be in the public 24 hours a day & be forced to grieve in public over the loss of a good friend? Relax! Ringo & Paul have done fine in my meager little speck of an opinion.

graemlins/peace.gif
Nick<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">You said it all! And welcome! graemlins/wave2.gif

Guitar Devil
Apr 11, 2003, 03:36 AM
Thanks for the article, it was really touching, and Paul seems just so awsome (still), taking the London underground. images/icons/grin.gif

AnotherGirl83
Apr 11, 2003, 01:02 PM
Originally Posted By Sexy_Sadie:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Originally Posted By BeatNick:
Ok, I think this is a riot!

People... he said he held the guy's hand. That's it! He didn't tell you everything that happened in the whole four hours. LOL!

Get a grip!

I think he is respecting George's privacy by not telling us the whole thing. Wasn't there something else he was on or some article where he said he wasn't going to say much because George was a private person? I'm sure there was, but can't put my finger on it at the moment.

Anyway, shoo shoo you evil Paul haters! Take your hatred some place else! LOL!!! How would you like to be in the public 24 hours a day & be forced to grieve in public over the loss of a good friend? Relax! Ringo & Paul have done fine in my meager little speck of an opinion.

graemlins/peace.gif
Nick<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">You said it all! And welcome! graemlins/wave2.gif </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Ditto again images/icons/smile.gif graemlins/clap2.gif
And welcome, BeatNick! images/icons/smile.gif

BeatNick
Apr 11, 2003, 03:06 PM
Originally Posted By Sexy_Sadie:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Originally Posted By BeatNick:
Ok, I think this is a riot!

People... he said he held the guy's hand. That's it! He didn't tell you everything that happened in the whole four hours. LOL!

Get a grip!

I think he is respecting George's privacy by not telling us the whole thing. Wasn't there something else he was on or some article where he said he wasn't going to say much because George was a private person? I'm sure there was, but can't put my finger on it at the moment.

Anyway, shoo shoo you evil Paul haters! Take your hatred some place else! LOL!!! How would you like to be in the public 24 hours a day & be forced to grieve in public over the loss of a good friend? Relax! Ringo & Paul have done fine in my meager little speck of an opinion.

graemlins/peace.gif
Nick<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">You said it all! And welcome! graemlins/wave2.gif </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">thanks for the welcome, sexie sadie. nice to be able to spend some time here!

nick

BeatNick
Apr 11, 2003, 03:08 PM
and thanks to beatlebangs and another girl for the welcomes, too! cool people here, huh?

nick

AnotherGirl83
Apr 12, 2003, 12:58 AM
Originally Posted By Sexy_Sadie:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Originally Posted By beatlebangs1964:
I[/i] were going to see Paul McCartney, what would I like to see him do?" Paul is, IMHO a very generous individual.
<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Exxxxxactly! images/icons/smile.gif </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Ditto! images/icons/smile.gif

Ruby Soho
Apr 25, 2003, 02:18 PM
Originally Posted By Magill:
Oh, I'm so sure! graemlins/images/icons/rolleyes.gif
Scenario
Ringo: You go, Paul.
Paul: No, after you, Ritch.
Ringo: No...I insist!
Paul: Age before beauty...
graemlins/laugh2.gif
<font size="2" face="Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif">Haha! That's funny images/icons/grin.gif

[ Apr 25, 2003, 02:20 PM: Message Edited By: Ruby Soho ]